20 minutes · No commitment
AI Maturity
Spectrum™
Map your organisation across six dimensions and four maturity levels. Replace assumptions with evidence before making investment decisions.
The Problem This Solves
Most organisations operate on assumptions about their AI maturity. That's why investment decisions fail.
Without a diagnostic baseline, leadership makes AI investment decisions based on hope, vendor promises, or what competitors claim to be doing. The Spectrum maps reality before decisions are made.
80%+ of mid-market prospects score Developing — enough investment to have pain, not enough discipline to have results. This is the gap the Spectrum reveals.
Four Maturity Levels
Level 0 through Level 3
Shadow Adoption
AI tools are being used informally by individuals. No governance, no ownership, no visibility into what's happening.
Individual Tools
Some AI tools adopted but not integrated into workflows. Pilots may exist but nothing reaches production.
Workflow Integration
AI is being built into operational workflows. Ownership exists but the operating model hasn't caught up. Pilots funded but stalling.
Most mid-market organisations sit here. This is where the Decision Discipline Program has the greatest impact.
Agentic Systems
AI handles end-to-end workflows with human oversight at key checkpoints. Governance is mature. Delivery compounds quarter over quarter.
Six Dimensions
Where the Spectrum measures
Each dimension is scored independently. Your overall level is the composite — but the dimension-level view reveals exactly where to focus.
Strategic Alignment
Limited understanding. No documented strategy. No pilots shipped.
Moderate understanding. Ad hoc plans. Pilots running but none in production.
Deep expertise embedded in planning. Board-approved strategy with milestones. Multiple workflows live.
Organisational Focus
AI investment from existing budgets. Nobody owns it. Siloed efforts.
Partially dedicated budget. Senior champion but not primary role. Some coordination.
Dedicated budget with board visibility. Named team with exec sponsor. Systematic governance.
Policies & Governance
No usage policy. Data governance not addressed. Would struggle with regulators.
Guidelines exist but inconsistent. Basic data governance with gaps. Partial documentation.
Comprehensive policy, actively enforced. Integrated data governance. Full regulatory documentation.
Staff Skills
Under 10% daily adoption. No formal training. No tool evaluation process.
10–50% adoption, inconsistent. Some training, not systematic. Informal evaluation.
Over 50% embedded adoption. Structured training with benchmarks. Formal evaluation: security, privacy, ROI.
Deployment
No autonomous workflows. Not measuring ROI. Shutting off AI wouldn't change much.
1–2 partial automations. Some metrics, no framework. A few workflows would slow down.
Multiple end-to-end workflows. Clear before/after ROI. AI is load-bearing — disruption if removed.
Continuous Improvement
No review process. Underperformance ignored. Low 12-month confidence.
Occasional reviews. Ad hoc response to issues. Moderate confidence.
Quarterly reviews with scale/kill criteria. Defined process for iteration. High confidence, evidence-based.
Where This Fits
The Spectrum powers three products
Pilot Purgatory Score™
Self-assessment. 18 questions across all 6 dimensions. See where you stand.
$5,500 + GSTPilot Autopsy
2-week diagnostic. We apply the Spectrum with executive interviews and workflow mapping.
Scoped in discoveryDecision Discipline Program™
The Spectrum informs the DIAGNOSE phase — executive interviews and the Employee AI Survey.
Start with a free assessment